Pearson Edexcel · A-Level · Economics B

    Course version: 9EB0 · Version from Sept 2015

    Barriers to entry: a) Contestability and ease of entry

    Contestability refers to the ease with which new firms can enter and exit a market.

    Checked against the Pearson Edexcel 9EB0 specification (opens in a new tab) on .

    • Point 1 of 4
    • 4 key terms

    Study notes

    From the checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    The idea

    Contestability refers to the ease with which new firms can enter and exit a market. A perfectly contestable market has no barriers to entry or exit, meaning sunk costs are zero and new entrants have access to the same technology as incumbent firms. The threat of entry alone can force existing firms to price competitively (limit pricing) to deter new rivals, leading to productive and allocative efficiency even if the market is highly concentrated.

    For example: The budget airline industry is highly contestable because aircraft can be leased rather than bought, reducing sunk costs and making entry and exit relatively easy compared to traditional airlines.

    What earns the marks

    • Define contestability as the degree of ease of entry into and exit from a market.
    • Identify that perfectly contestable markets have zero sunk costs.
    • Explain that the threat of entry can influence the behaviour of incumbent firms, such as adopting limit pricing.
    • Recognise that high contestability can lead to outcomes similar to perfect competition, such as normal profits in the long run.

    Common mistakes and how to put them right

    • Confusing contestability with competition.

      Put it right: Competition refers to the number of firms currently in the market, whereas contestability refers to the threat of potential new entrants.

    • Assuming contestable markets must have many firms.

      Put it right: A monopoly or oligopoly can be highly contestable if barriers to entry and exit are low.

    • Believing that all costs are barriers to exit.

      Put it right: Only sunk costs (unrecoverable costs) act as barriers to exit and reduce contestability.

    Exam tips

    • Always link contestability to the concept of sunk costs when evaluating market structures.
    • Use the threat of 'hit-and-run' entry to explain why incumbent firms might choose to make only normal profit.
    • When analysing real-world markets, evaluate how technological changes have increased contestability by lowering entry barriers.

    Try the lesson

    The start of the Barriers to entry: a) Contestability and ease of entry lesson, made from checked teaching notes for this specification point.

    Have a go first

    Which of the following characteristics is most likely to be found in a perfectly contestable market?

    Listen

    Contestability refers to the ease with which new firms can enter and exit a market. A perfectly contestable market has no barriers to entry or exit, meaning sunk costs are zero and new entrants have access to the same technology as incumbent firms. The threat of entry alone can force existing firms to price competitively (limit pricing) to deter new rivals, leading to productive and allocative efficiency even if the market is highly concentrated. For example, the budget airline industry is highly contestable because aircraft can be leased rather than bought, reducing sunk costs and making entry and exit relatively easy compared to traditional airlines. A strong answer earns marks for these points. Define contestability as the degree of ease of entry into and exit from a market. Identify that perfectly contestable markets have zero sunk costs. Explain that the threat of entry can influence the behaviour of incumbent firms, such as adopting limit pricing. Recognise that high contestability can lead to outcomes similar to perfect competition, such as normal profits in the long run. A common slip: Confusing contestability with competition. Instead, Competition refers to the number of firms currently in the market, whereas contestability refers to the threat of potential new entrants. Exam tip: Always link contestability to the concept of sunk costs when evaluating market structures.

    See it

    A top-down flowchart. The top node reads 'Contestability: ease of entry and exit'. It branches into two parts. The first branch leads to 'Perfectly contestable market', which then splits into three nodes: 'No barriers to entry or exit', 'Sunk costs are zero', and 'New entrants access same technology as incumbents'. The second branch leads to 'Threat of entry', which flows to 'Incumbents adopt limit pricing', then to 'Productive and allocative efficiency', and finally to 'Normal profits in the long run'.
    Shows how contestability and the threat of entry lead incumbent firms to limit pricing and efficient, normal-profit outcomes.

    Key words

    Say what each word means before you turn the card.

    Contestability

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Perfectly contestable market

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Sunk costs

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    Limit pricing

    Try answering aloud or in your head before turning the card.

    See every definition
    Contestability
    The ease with which new firms can enter and exit a market.
    Perfectly contestable market
    A market with no barriers to entry or exit, meaning sunk costs are zero and new entrants have access to the same technology as incumbent firms.
    Sunk costs
    Unrecoverable costs that act as barriers to exit and reduce contestability.
    Limit pricing
    Pricing competitively to deter new rivals, used by existing firms because of the threat of entry.

    Label the diagram

    Some boxes have lost their names. Pick the right name for each number.

    The diagram again, with 3 boxes numbered instead of named. A top-down flowchart. The top node reads 'Contestability: ease of entry and exit'. It branches into two parts. The first branch leads to 'Perfectly contestable market', which then splits into three nodes: 'No barriers to entry or exit', 'Sunk costs are zero', and 'New entrants access same technology as incumbents'. The second branch leads to 'Threat of entry', which flows to 'Incumbents adopt limit pricing', then to 'Productive and allocative efficiency', and finally to 'Normal profits in the long run'.
    • 1Box 1

    • 2Box 2

    • 3Box 3

    0 of 3 labelled

    There is more to this lesson

    The full lesson goes on to check your understanding and help you earn the marks. Create a free account to carry on, with your progress saved.

    Carry on with the full lesson

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge

    Test your understanding of Barriers to entry: a) Contestability and ease of entry

    Active recall beats re-reading. Take an instant quiz now to test what you’ve learned and lock it into long-term memory.

    Take topic quiz

    A week of Premium from your first lesson · Then the free plan continues · No card, no charge